critical thinking abilities University of Dayton write a review article Stanstead College critical thinking website MacEwan University writing journal paper Istituto Marangoni Milano writing a case study essay Curtin University Singapore university essay writing service Hurtwood House how to write a rogerian essay CATS College Canterbury write argumentative essay The University of Nottingham how to write a contrast essay Clifton College how to write easy essay Cardiff Sixth Form College 6 stages of critical thinking Trinity College School how to write a english essay University of South Carolina article about research Oregon State University (INTO) write magazine articles College Beau Soleil how to write a short newspaper article Albert College things to write a descriptive essay about European University Cyprus write essay climate change Albert College writing a psychology essay Conestoga College review of research paper The University of Westminster

Go to Bing homepage
Go to Bing homepage

We did not find any results for words for argumentative essay Simon Fraser University/Fraser International College - NAVITAS.

Search tips:

  • Ensure words are spelled correctly.
  • Try less specific keywords.
  • Try rephrasing keywords or using synonyms.
  • Make your queries as concise as possible.
Feedback

words for argumentative essay Simon Fraser University/Fraser International College - NAVITAS

Police militarization is a hot-button topic these days. Some believe that criticizing the actions of the police hurts their ability to do their job, while others argue that the police are overstepping their authority and often cause more harm than good. Both passages address this issue head on; however, the critique of police militarization published by the ACLU is the best-supported and drawing teachers.com st. michaels university school, ultimately the most convincing argument. While the second passage lacks specific statistical data, the ACLU states that there were 80,000 military raids by police last year. This is surprising and supports the idea that military-style raids have become too commonplace in society. High school essay writing Rotterdam Business School. The writer then highlights the words for argumentative essay Simon Fraser University/Fraser International College - NAVITAS inherent problem with these raids: “of all the incidents studied where the number and race of the people impacted were known, 39 percent were Black, 11 percent were Latino, 20 were white.” Police militarization has disproportionately impacted African-Americans, further supporting how detrimental police militarization is drawing teachers.com st. michaels university school, to society. Another reason why the ACLU’s argument is better-supported than Hagner’s argument is because it directly discusses ethical corruption, unlike Hagner’s essay. Features of an article writing Domus Academy. The ACLU states, “Companies like Lockheed Martin and Blackhawk Industries are making record profits by selling their equipment to local police departments that have received Department of features of an article writing domus academy Homeland Security grants.” The ACLU implies that the reason for high school essay writing rotterdam business school, this militarization is profit; if this is true, then there is no actual real-world need for the militarization of the police. How to write compare and contrast essays Badminton School. Private companies are ultimately designed to make money, not help the police, so police militarization poses an ethical problem. Finally, the ACLU’s argument is much more convincing than Hagner’s argument because it uses much more impactful diction. How to write a good conclusion to an essay Windermere Preparatory School. The forcefulness of calling the how to write compare and contrast essays badminton school drug war “wasteful and failed” highlights the high-stakes nature of this issue. Readers, most likely taxpayers, have a vested interest in not having their money wasted by the government. The author goes on to imply that the reader may not be safe, since “heavily armed SWAT teams are raiding people’s homes in the middle of words for argumentative essay Simon Fraser University/Fraser International College - NAVITAS the night.” The tone of this essay is words for argumentative essay Simon Fraser University/Fraser International College - NAVITAS, much more impassioned than the tone of the second, helping to draw engage the words for argumentative essay Simon Fraser University/Fraser International College - NAVITAS reader on an emotional level. In summary, the words for argumentative essay Simon Fraser University/Fraser International College - NAVITAS ACLU’s argument is better-supported because it includes more data, accusations of ethical corruption, and forceful language that engages the reader. Hagner’s argument has some merit, because it does a good job organizing points with a numbered list, but it is ultimately too dry in tone and words for argumentative essay Simon Fraser University/Fraser International College - NAVITAS, does not include any data or quotes from authority figures to back up its claims. The ACLU’s argument winds up more effectively convincing readers that the militarization of police is something we should all be concerned about. This essay is drawing teachers.com st. michaels university school, very well-organized. words for argumentative essay Simon Fraser University/Fraser International College - NAVITAS. It uses 5 paragraphs and lays out the structure in the following manner: Paragraph 1 — Introduction (why the ACLU position is better-supported) Paragraph 2 — Reason #1 — Statistics (two examples given from words for argumentative essay Simon Fraser University/Fraser International College - NAVITAS, passage) Paragraph 3 — Reason #2 — Ethics (one example given from passage) Paragraph 4 — Reason #3 — Diction (two examples given from passage) Paragraph 5 — Conclusion. In the introduction, the author thoughtfully presents the topic of police militarization and explains why it is relevant in how to write a good conclusion to an essay windermere preparatory school today’s society. Both arguments are introduced, and the thesis is clearly placed at the end of the paragraph so they are easy for the how to write a good conclusion to an essay windermere preparatory school reader to find. The thesis clearly states which argument the author believes is better-supported, and the language is confident. Each of the next three body paragraphs is well-organized, starting with transitional words or phrases and including at least one example that supports the words for argumentative essay Simon Fraser University/Fraser International College - NAVITAS thesis. The body paragraphs cite specific examples from the passage, and then explain how those examples support the words for argumentative essay Simon Fraser University/Fraser International College - NAVITAS overall argument. The author uses three different examples: statistics, ethics, and words for argumentative essay Simon Fraser University/Fraser International College - NAVITAS, vocabulary, to how to write a good conclusion to an essay windermere preparatory school prove why the ACLU’s argument is better-supported. words for argumentative essay Simon Fraser University/Fraser International College - NAVITAS. These diverse examples show that the author understands what makes an argument weak or strong. Finally, the concluding paragraph makes a minor concession to the opposing side, praising the numbered list that appears therein, before reiterating the thesis from the Introduction. The essay avoids any grammar or spelling errors and the sentence structure is clear and varied with the appropriate usage of commas and article review apa queen anne’s school, other punctuation. Clear command of the English language is demonstrated. As a result, this essay would earn a perfect score.