The main problem was Philip II, King of steps to write a persuasive essay shawnigan lake school,
France, this was caused because Richard I refused to marry Philipâ€™s sister. This was a major problem because Philip was very powerful, cunning, and critical thinking kids College Beau Soleil,
rich and kept trying attack England, but unfortunately for John, at the time he didnâ€™t have enough money or soldiers to critical thinking kids College Beau Soleil,
try and defeat Philip, therefore continued losing all his battles. A second problem was Pope Innocent III, caused by Johnâ€™s father and brother as they kept arguing with the pope over who should have the most power over critical thinking kids College Beau Soleil,
This meant that the pope thought that he should have the most power over steps to write an argumentative essay pickering college,
England, but John also disagreed to this, so the pope declared that there would be no funerals or marriages until John gave in. Finally, John having no other option gave in, however this proved lucky for John as the pope supported John in writing compare and contrast essays new york film academy
his battles. The final problem was Roger Bigod, Earl of Norfolk caused by Johnâ€™s father because he kept harassing Rogerâ€™s father as he kept rebelling against him.
This made things harder for John because Roger wanted revenge and John was the one from steps to write a persuasive essay shawnigan lake school,
their family alive. Since Roger was a baron, he could get all the critical thinking skill international college of management (icms)
other barons on their side and stop lending their soldiers to King John for paul elder critical thinking cologne business school
all his battles, and critical thinking kids College Beau Soleil,
instead use them to attack him. There is law essay writing service hult international business school,
a lot of evidence to suggest that John was a bad king. For example he used to take lots of extra taxes to pay for his battles; furthermore he ends up losing which means all the money is wasted.
Even if John did have a lot of problems that he did not create himself, his personality made them worse so he could not even resolve them. John was hot-tempered, stubborn, cruel, mocking and steps to write a persuasive essay shawnigan lake school,
secretive. Most importantly, he did not have much control over critical thinking skill international college of management (icms),
England because first paupers and critical thinking kids College Beau Soleil,
peasants rebelled him, then increasing to writing compare and contrast essays new york film academy,
knights and powerful barons. Steps to write an argumentative essay Pickering College!
However, John can also be seen as an unlucky ruler, such as in 1214 during a battle between John and Philip, King Philip was about how to write an essay for college scholarships abbey college manchester,
to die when one of his own soldiers betrayed him and saved Philip.
Unfortunately, Johnâ€™s French and critical thinking kids College Beau Soleil,
English barons broke their promise to be loyal and gave away Johnâ€™s land to the French King. Finally, there is evidence that John was actually a good ruler. critical thinking kids College Beau Soleil!
For example, he reinforced the British Navy, for instance and introduced a new; presumably better, monetary system to make government finances easier and he revamped the countryâ€™s law courts. John also took control of Scotland, Wales and Ireland, thus bringing relative peace to the realms of Britain.
Furthermore in critical thinking kids College Beau Soleil
1214, John actually won several battles against Philip and got some of his land back, this proves that he wasnâ€™t really a soft sword after all. Interpretations of John have changed a great deal since the Middle Ages. In Tudor time, the people supported John because he was similar to their own ruler (Henry VIII) that he fought with the pope and paul elder critical thinking cologne business school,
Henry also had problems with the critical thinking kids College Beau Soleil
French. They also believed that the barons have nothing to how to write an essay for college scholarships abbey college manchester,
do with the critical thinking kids College Beau Soleil
kingâ€™s reign and that they should not interfere.
The Tudors were probably told this by their ancestors. Paul elder critical thinking Cologne Business School!
In contrast, the critical thinking kids College Beau Soleil
Victorians thought that John was a Devil and a Villain because he divorced his wife, took land from the church which was a holy place and treated priests badly. critical thinking kids College Beau Soleil!
They believed the Magna Carta is very important because it means that no king could do what they liked. They thought this because they read the books written by monks; which very biased because they only stated the bad things that John did because they were on the popeâ€™s side.
Modern Historians donâ€™t agree about John because they thought he was unlucky but a good king because they thought he was organised and ran the government well, but he was unlucky and inherited many of his problems. Having examined all the evidence, I have concluded that John was not a bad king. This is because in most circumstances he was just very unlucky otherwise he could have easily overcome his problems. Law essay writing service Hult International Business School!
Finally, he did have some good qualities were enough to run a country peacefully. Therefore my final conclusion is that King John was not a bad king!